How Much Capital is needed to Reach the 1.5°C Targets? An In-Depth Analysis

Published by firstgreen on

Understanding the 1.5°C Targets

The climate targets set forth in international agreements, especially the 1.5°C target, is not merely a number. It symbolizes a global commitment to reduce the impact of human-induced climate change. Achieving these targets involves adopting renewable energy sources on a vast scale. The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) emphasized the significance of exponential deployment of renewable sources, primarily solar PV capacity, to meet the 1.5°C Scenario by 2030.

Exponential Growth versus Linear Forecasting

It’s essential to comprehend the difference between linear forecasting and exponential growth when considering renewable deployment. In 2020, the world witnessed the installation of 127 GW solar capacity, bringing the cumulative total to 707 GW. By linear forecasting, it would take about 36 years of consistent 127 GW annual installations to achieve the IRENA’s ambitious 2030 target of 5,200 GW. This calculation may sound daunting.

However, if we pivot our understanding towards exponential growth, a much more hopeful picture emerges. To attain the 5,200 GW goal in just a decade, an annual growth rate of 22% is required. This percentage is very achievable, especially when you consider that the annual capacity growth for solar has averaged a whopping 33% over the past ten years.

The Capital Question: How much is required?

When we look at the finances required to facilitate this energy transition, the linear versus exponential debate remains central.

Linear forecasts, assuming costs remain stagnant, paint the energy transition as a colossal financial burden. However, a shift in perspective to exponential forecasts, which expect costs to decrease exponentially (as witnessed over the past decade), offers a much more affordable vision of the energy transition.

To elucidate this further, let’s delve into the capital required for fixed solar capacity costs to achieve IRENA’s 1.5°C target of a staggering 14,036 GW by 2050. Starting with a 2019 assumption of a fixed cost of USD 1 per watt, without any decrease in costs, the total expenditure exceeds USD 13 trillion. However, if we project a cost decline of 5-10% annually, this cost can be drastically reduced to a range of USD 3-6 trillion. This illustrates the potential economic viability of the energy transition, given the right conditions and growth trajectory.

Driving Forward: Strategies and Recommendations

To efficiently drive forward the renewable energy transition and ensure we are financially prepared, certain strategies are recommended:

  1. Investment in Research & Development: As technological advancements are made, costs will naturally decline. It is paramount that governments, industries, and academic institutions prioritize research in renewable technologies.
  2. Incentivizing Renewable Adoption: Government policies can play a pivotal role by offering incentives for businesses and households that opt for renewable energy sources. This can facilitate faster adoption and growth.
  3. Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborations between governments and industries can accelerate the deployment of renewable infrastructure, ensuring that cost declines are passed onto consumers.
  4. Global Cooperation: Climate change is a global issue, and international cooperation can lead to shared technologies, resources, and best practices, ensuring the affordability of the energy transition.

Conclusion: A Future of Exponential Possibilities

As the world grapples with the challenge of climate change, understanding the difference between linear and exponential growth in renewable energy deployment is crucial. The transition to renewable energy not only stands as an environmental imperative but, with the right strategies, can also be an economically viable path forward.